Hosting Streaming Video


Hosting streaming video: before learning all the things that you can about different hosting streaming video services, you need to be aware about the goal that you want to achieve on using it.  You should not settle on the price alone or the popularity.  The additional features that come with it may very well bring the success of your business. 



Hosting Streaming Video

An essential video streaming platform will provide an avenue for live streaming and also grants the user a capability to hose video on-demand or recorded video.  The more advanced and comprehensive hosting streaming video service will permit you to have a better control of your recordings, analyze your content, monetize, embed, host and broadcast.  Here are our top recommendations on the features.

Top Features of the Best Hosting Streaming Video Services:

Reliability

Since the hosting streaming video has accumulated a large audience, it is but natural for your business to find a reliable service.  Some of the most recommended platform with impeccable reliability would be Brightcove, Wowza, Livestream, Ustream and DaCast since they allow you in streaming your recording internationally without viewer limit.  Aside from that, you should also find a platform with added essential features.  There are other programs that can give you a detailed analysis of your viewers, such as their age, location, and others.

Price

Hosting Streaming Video: most of the consumers are basing the service that they will receive on the tag price.  And since there is a stiff competition in the field of hosting streaming video services, consumers are hoping to find the best features and quality that are offered at the most affordable price.  Fortunately, the consumers had the stiff competition to thank for.  Because of the existing rivalry, the price of the service was able to maintain at an optimum level.  Based on the sheer price alone, DaCast will be the most affordable price at a very low price of $19 per month.  Brightcove, on the other hand, can be customized based on the features and the plans that you will acquire.  Unfortunately, with the price of DaCast, there is a limitation on the storage as well as on the Ad-Free hours.  If you want something that offers an unlimited storage and unlimited ad-free, then Livestream which has a price of $49 per month would be great for you.


Verdict

Hosting Streaming Video:  when we look at the features of different hosting streaming video services at their basic level, it is a battle between Livestream and DaCast.  Unfortunately, when it comes to the amount of channels, you are limited wit Livestream with only one channel while DaCast is offering an unlimited channel at their basic price.  Furthermore, you will also receive analytics and customer support that you will not get with other services on t heir basic price. Livestream does not offer customer support, and you will have to pay at least $199 per month in order to review the analytics.


Hosting Streaming Video
Cost-Effective Video Marketing and On Demand Monetization Simplified with Uscreen - Yahoo Finance

with Uscreen - Yahoo Finance


WASHINGTON, July 28, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Uscreen is an all-in-one video on demand (VOD) platform that combines video hosting, billing and content management. Anyone can choose from a dozen pre-built, customizable and responsive themes to quickly launch a powerful video streaming website within minutes and easily stream video, audio, podcasts and all types of documents. The setup requires no coding and can all be done via a WSYWIG editor.
Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20160727/393505LOGO
The cloud hosted, secure and 100% white label solution also offers a fully loaded CMS with a theme builder, 3 levels of authentication, unlimited video storage and bandwidth, free encoding with multi-bit rate streaming for mobile and multi-device delivery, bulk uploading, and even third party integration with MailChimp, SalesForce, InfusionSoft and a dozen others. Uscreen uses 2 major CDNs (EdgeCast and Akamai) that guarantee content security and instant high-quality playback. All these features are available for a fixed monthly price – no revenue share and no other fees.
"Due to the subscription economy and exploding demand for video, companies are flocking to us, looking to launch digital subscription services that have proven to be profitable, based on the history of the customers who have launched with us in the last 36 months," said PJ Taei, President at Uscreen.
Video marketing is proven to boost brand reputation, customer acquisition and engagement. Uscreen is also empowering SMBs to monetize their digital content through one-time, rental and subscription sales. The platform enables startups, industry and thought leaders, small businesses and organizations to build highly profitable video streaming portals for more than 1,000 paying customers globally.
Uscreen will soon launch a marketing component that will allow users to build a funnel system to increase sales and memberships by launching sales pages. More information is available here.
About Uscreen:  Uscreen is a VOD platform that allows users to build profitable subscription video websites and securely distribute digital content to a global audience. The powerful yet simple and secure platform is perfect fit for all kinds of companies. It also features built-in proprietary DRM for copyright protection and privacy of all kinds of content, including audio, video, podcasts, PDFs and documents.


Media Contact:
Name: PJ Taei Phone: 877-503-4678 Email Website: http://www.uscreen.tv
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cost-effective-video-marketing-and-on-demand-monetization-simplified-with-uscreen-300305376.html

Hosting Streaming Video
Live Video Platforms Should Assume They Will Eventually Host Footage of a Police Shooting - Slate Magazine

Hosting Streaming Video: on Wednesday, 32-year-old Philando Castile, a black man from Falcon Heights, Minnesota, was shot and killed by a police officer during a traffic stop. From the front passenger seat, his girlfriend began filming a Facebook Live video of Castile bleeding in the driver’s seat and a police officer pointing a gun at Castile and talking. The video went on for 10 minutes.

After the stream was over and posted to Facebook for playback, it then went down for at least an hour in the immediate aftermath of the incident. Facebook told the Telegraph, “We’re very sorry that the video was inaccessible. ... It was down to a technical glitch and restored as soon as we were able to investigate.” This technical difficulty seems oddly coincidental given the sensitive nature of the video, but it is conceivable, especially if the video was receiving high traffic. It is now labeled, “Warning—Graphic Video. Videos that contain graphic content can shock, offend and upset. Are you sure you want to see this?”

Facebook has used this type of warning skin before, as with footage of the Walter Scott shooting last April. And certainly other social networks have struggled to make the right calls about policing inappropriate content. In 2014, for example, Twitter created controversy when it tried to suppress images of the beheading of journalist James Foley by ISIS. But there’s a whole other dimension when a video was streaming in real-time for anyone to see and then is later covered with a warning. Streaming services like Facebook Live, which launched in 2015 for celebrities and in April for all users, and Periscope, which is owned by Twitter and started in 2015, show events as they happen. As such they bring an additional complication to the already fraught question of how social networks should react, if at all, to controversial user-generated content.

Hosting Streaming Video: a service like Facebook Live has a user base of more than 1.6 billion daily users. Though an individual person may not be able to instantly capitalize on this audience, footage that is societally significant, like the Philando Castile shooting video, can spread quickly. A service like Periscope has a smaller initial base. Bloomberg estimated in June that Twitter has less than 140 million active users every day. It’s still millions of people and can certainly surface important footage, but the scale is different.

The services also take different approaches to graphic video. Facebook writes in its Community Standards:

Facebook has long been a place where people share their experiences and raise awareness about important issues. Sometimes, those experiences and issues involve violence and graphic images of public interest or concern, such as human rights abuses or acts of terrorism. In many instances, when people share this type of content, they are condemning it or raising awareness about it. We remove graphic images when they are shared for sadistic pleasure or to celebrate or glorify violence.

Hosting Streaming Video: when people share anything on Facebook, we expect that they will share it responsibly, including carefully choosing who will see that content. We also ask that people warn their audience about what they are about to see if it includes graphic violence.

This commentary focuses mostly on how to share content and talks less about what Facebook will do if it feels that a user isn’t meeting these standards. Periscope’s Community Guidelines are similar, but put less emphasis on the inevitability of graphic content.

Periscope is intended to be open and safe. To maintain a healthy platform, explicit graphic content is not allowed. Explicit graphic content includes, but is not limited to, depictions of child abuse, animal abuse, or bodily harm. Periscope is not for content that is intended to incite violence, or includes a direct and specific threat of violence to others. Periscope reserves the right to allow sensitive content when it is artistic, educational, scientific or newsworthy.
Given the data they host, content-sharing platforms have a subtle but deep power. As Motherboard wrote Thursday, “Facebook has become the self-appointed gatekeeper for what is acceptable content to show the public, which is an incredibly important and powerful position to be in.” It may not have been obvious at first, but it’s been recognizable for years now, and it’s time for companies to own it and make their positions plain.
When someone begins to record and stream an in-progress terrorist attack, he or she doesn’t have time to research which site will most value this type of contribution. Facebook’s Community Standards seem to imply that the company is open to supporting content that promotes transparency, while Periscope’s guidelines are more hesitant. For Facebook, it’s time to walk that walk so its users can get a better sense of what to expect. Companies have the right to promote whatever values they want—but they need to make these attributes prominent in their brands and consistent in their application. That way, consumers can make informed choices about where to take their data when it counts the most.

About the author: Lily Hay Newman is a staff writer and the lead blogger for Future Tense.


Hosting Streaming Video
Web publishing pioneer takes on virtual reality with new camera system - Waterbury Republican American

Halsey Minor was one of the pioneering figures in web publishing. Now he's hoping to get in on the ground floor of virtual reality.

Minor has founded Reality Lab Networks, a Los Angeles startup that's developed a camera system and a cloud service for use in creating 360-degree videos. The company's goal is to make it easy and relatively inexpensive for creative professionals to produce, edit and distribute high-quality virtual reality videos.

The company plans to ship its Live Planet camera system, which has 16 high-definition camera modules arrayed in a circle, in the fourth quarter. Reality Lab announced that it's taking pre-orders for the Live Planet system and will sell the first 500 for about $5,000, or half off its regular price.

"What we're trying to do is make it so creatives can spend their money being creative," Minor said.

The Live Planet device itself will stitch together the images captured by its cameras. Reality Lab will offer a cloud service that will allow creative professionals to encode their videos in particular formats and distribute them to various virtual reality video hosting platforms. Reality Lab plans to eventually charge a subscription fee for its cloud service.

The camera system will be able to live stream 360-degree videos or record it for later streaming.

Reality Lab is one of a growing number of companies that are developing cameras or service for creating virtual reality videos. Among its competitors are Nokia, which makes the Ozo camera system, and NextVR, which produces live 360-degree video streams and has its own camera system.

Minor founded CNET, a company originally planned to be a cable channel specializing in coverage of computing, but which eventually became one of the first web publishers. He also co-founded Salesforce.com and Grand Central, which became Google Voice.


Hosting Streaming Video
YouTube, Facebook Streaming Republican, Democratic ... - Variety - Variety

The two biggest online-video players, YouTube and Facebook, are diving into the political fray with plans to bring live video feeds from both the 2016 Republican and Democratic national conventions to their platforms.

YouTube is reprising its role as the official live-stream provider of both the Republican National Convention, which runs from July 18-21 in Cleveland, and the Democratic National Convention, which will take place July 25-28 in Philadelphia. The Google-owned video giant was also the official streamer for the parties’ 2012 presidential nominating confabs.

This year, for the first time, YouTube will live-stream the conventions in 360-degree video — which, depending on your political leanings, is either a thrilling or horrifying prospect. YouTube’s 360 videos provide a wrap-around perspective users can control with their finger on mobile devices or via a mouse cursor on a computer. The live video also will be available to view in virtual reality via Google Cardboard: Are you ready to see Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton in VR?

Facebook also is looking to bring live video from the GOP and Democratic proceedings onto its service. The company will set up a “lounge” in both convention halls and has invited 22 media orgs, including CNN, Fox News and the New York Times, to use the spaces to broadcast live video, a rep said. In addition, C-SPAN plans to use Facebook Live during the conventions from about 8-11 p.m. each night, and Facebook is encouraging convention delegates and individual members of the media to use the service, as well.

Twitter, meanwhile, is teaming with CBS News to live-stream coverage from CBSN, the company’s free broadband-delivered video news service, from both conventions on its platform.

YouTube’s RNC coverage will be streamed at youtube.com/gopconvention and the DNC will be hosted starting July 25 at youtube.com/demconvention. The video service also called out several YouTube channels and creators set to cover the conventions on the platform, including the Young Turks, Complex News, Seeker Daily, Ingrid Nilsen, Mark Watson and Julie Borowski.

Facebook also is looking to bring live video from the GOP and Democratic proceedings onto its service. The company will set up a “lounge” in both convention halls and has invited 22 media orgs, including CNN, Fox News and the New York Times, to use the spaces to broadcast live video, a rep said.

In addition, C-SPAN plans to use Facebook Live during the conventions from about 8-11 p.m. each night, and Facebook is encouraging convention delegates and individual members of the media to use the service, as well.

Twitter, meanwhile, is teaming with CBS News to live-stream coverage from CBSN, the company’s free broadband-delivered video news service, from both conventions on its platform.

YouTube’s RNC coverage will be streamed at youtube.com/gopconvention and the DNC will be hosted starting July 25 at youtube.com/demconvention. The video service also called out several YouTube channels and creators set to cover the conventions on the platform, including the Young Turks, Complex News, Seeker Daily, Ingrid Nilsen, Mark Watson and Julie Borowski.


Hosting Streaming Video
Read More Articles About Web Hosting!

Streaming Audio Hosting:

Do You Need It?

Now, you have finally found your niche, so you went on to registering your domain name, and built your website. You may have already seen some results on your efforts to introduce internet marketing, and yet you want more. After researching further, you found out that other e-commerce websites are making it big by simply adding streaming audio hosting to their websites. Do you need it? Read on and find out!

Streaming Audio Hosting


Best Web Hosting Service: Factors to Consider When Looking

The hosting service plays an important role in how well the website serves the needs of your audience in a variety of ways. With every company claiming to be the best web hosting service out there, it is important for businesses and individuals to have a means of sorting through them and identify the most suitable option.

Best Web Hosting Service



Don't dream your life, live your dream!

Discover how these everyday entrepreneurs made it happen!

Success Stories



It's Not About Building a Website, It's About Creating Your Success

Proof of Success

Recent Articles

  1. Katerina Stamatelos: composer, pianist, poetess, painter.

    Nov 17, 17 05:52 PM

    Katerina Stamatelos: New Music composer, pianist, poetess, painter, fashion designer.

    Read More

  2. Inexpensive Coworkers Christmas Gifts. Ornaments. Under 5 Dollars Gifts.

    Nov 16, 17 10:28 PM

    Inexpensive Coworkers Christmas Gifts. DYI and Cheap Gifts. Ornaments. Under 5 Dollars Gifts.

    Read More

  3. AAA Automobile Insurance. Convenient and Comprehensive Service.

    Nov 16, 17 07:40 AM

    AAA Automobile Insurance. Convenient and Comprehensive Service.

    Read More